What Happened Today - 9 Feb 2026
What Happened Today – 9 Feb 2026
Bad Bunny vs. Turning Point USA by the Numbers
American Olympians speak out
Musk and USAID…
Epstein Depositions…
Court Rulings Update
Justice Department to allow Lawmakers to see unredacted Epstein Files
Independent Journalist…connecting the dots
The Power of our Independent Journalist
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bad Bunny vs. Turning Point USA by the Numbers
Bad Bunny absolutely owned that halftime show, and the numbers back it up, even if the usual suspects are desperately trying to spin their little “All-American” sideshow as something bigger than it was. Early figures have his performance in the mid‑130 million range, with multiple outlets saying it likely broke the all‑time Super Bowl halftime record and crossed 135 million viewers, which is just wild. Meanwhile, Turning Point’s Kid Rock “alternative” stream pulled a few million in real time, peaking somewhere around 5–6 million on YouTube, with some reports saying close to 9–10 million total streams once all views are counted, which is a fraction of what Bad Bunny had on the actual main stage. Puppy Bowl doesn’t live in the same universe as the Super Bowl in raw numbers, but it still pulls a solid audience in the low‑millions every year; 2025 drew about 12.8 million viewers, and 2026 was again hyped as a massive multi‑platform adoption event, so we’re talking millions watching, but nowhere near halftime‑show levels.
The reaction to Bad Bunny from a lot of America has basically split into two camps: people who actually watched it and got the point, and people who either refused to watch it or rage‑watched it just so they could complain that it “wasn’t American enough” because it was in Spanish. The folks who were there for it saw an insanely high‑energy, totally locked‑in performance that centered Latin music, culture, and pride and still felt bigger than just one artist flexing; it felt like a statement. When he started naming countries and places across Latin America and the Caribbean and tied it into that final message about unity and who gets to be seen as part of this country’s story, that hit hard; I can absolutely see tearing up at that, because it was one of the only times in a Super Bowl halftime that the idea of “America” actually looked like the people who live here instead of just the same old safe, sanitized version. That ending felt like he was saying: this is our America too, whether you like it or not, and we’re not asking permission to be here.
On the other side, you’ve got the Turning Point crowd throwing their little tantrum and trying to build their own “American halftime show” with Kid Rock and a handful of country acts, and acting like the official show was some kind of attack on the flag. The whole premise is ridiculous: they framed it as the “real” American halftime for people who were tired of “woke” entertainment, but all they really did was prove how fragile they are when someone who doesn’t look or sound like them gets the biggest stage in the country. And the fact that there were folks bragging they “couldn’t” watch the Bad Bunny show because it wasn’t in English, and because he’s from Puerto Rico, tells you everything about how small their world is—Puerto Rico is literally a U.S. territory, these are American citizens, and somehow that still doesn’t register for them as part of America.
The meltdown over an all‑Spanish‑language halftime show just exposed how many people only want “unity” when it looks and sounds exactly like them and comes with a guitar solo and a flag backdrop. Bad Bunny put on a show that pulled in more than a hundred‑thirty million people, spoke almost entirely in Spanish, shouted out places that never get mentioned on that stage, and still had the stadium and half the country jumping—that’s what America actually is right now, whether these folks accept it or not. The Turning Point stream, with Kid Rock doing throwback culture‑war cosplay for a fraction of the audience, is basically the perfect metaphor: loud, angry, convinced it’s the center of the universe, and completely dwarfed by the reality of what most people actually showed up to see.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
American Olympians speak out
Olympians are not holding back this year, and it is absolutely rattling Trump and his little cult of “stick to sports” screamers. Several U.S. athletes at the Milan–Cortina Winter Games have started speaking directly about how messed up this administration’s immigration crackdowns and anti‑LGBTQ policies are, using interviews and social media since they can’t protest on the podium. Freestyle skier Hunter Hess flat‑out said he has “mixed emotions” about representing the U.S. right now, that wearing the flag doesn’t mean he endorses everything happening back home, and that there’s a lot going on he’s “not the biggest fan of” — which, let’s be real, is the polite Olympic version of “this government is a disaster.” Figure skater Amber Glenn has talked about how hard this era has been on the LGBTQ+ community, pointing to things like shutting down an LGBTQ crisis hotline and attacks on trans‑inclusive policies, and she’s said she will not “shut up about politics” because it affects her daily life. Other athletes, like cross‑country star Jessie Diggins and hockey player Kelly Pannek, have tied their comments directly to ICE violence, saying they’re competing for an America that’s about compassion, not one where federal agents are killing people in communities like Minnesota.
Trump’s reaction is exactly what you’d expect from a thin‑skinned authoritarian who thinks patriotism means obedience to him personally. He jumped on Hunter Hess by calling him “a real Loser” on social media, whining that it’s “hard to root for someone like this” and saying if Hess doesn’t fully “represent his Country” the way Trump wants, he shouldn’t be on the team at all. Conservative hangers‑on have piled on too — people like Rep. Byron Donalds telling Hess to “GO HOME” if representing the U.S. with a conscience is “too hard,” and right‑wing has‑beens like Brett Favre and Rob Schneider fanning the outrage online. There are even segments on friendly networks and YouTube shows calling for “consequences” for athletes who dare to speak about ICE brutality or LGBTQ rights while wearing USA on their chest, as if free speech expires the minute you put on a uniform. It’s the same tired playbook: demand that athletes be silent props for power, and then scream betrayal when they remind everyone they’re actual human beings with values.
The thing is, for all the noise from Trump and the MAGA rage machine, there is real and visible support for these Olympians from everyday Americans. The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee has publicly backed athletes’ right to speak out, saying their advocacy for racial and social justice “absolutely aligns” with Team USA values and that they stand behind their well‑being and safety. Younger Americans especially have been clear for years that they’re fine with athletes getting political; polling has shown majorities — especially among Democrats and under‑50s — saying it’s acceptable for athletes to speak up, and that split is only getting sharper as this stuff keeps happening. You can see it online now: yes, there’s the predictable right‑wing mob, but there’s also a huge wave of people reposting Hunter Hess and Amber Glenn’s quotes, thanking them for saying what so many are feeling, and calling out Trump’s attacks as bullying and un‑American. At this point, the line is pretty clear: Trump and his crew want flag‑draped silence, but a growing chunk of the country is firmly on the side of Olympians who refuse to check their conscience at the border just to make him feel respected.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Musk and USAID…
Elon Musk getting dragged under oath over DOGE and USAID is exactly what happens when you treat an entire humanitarian agency like one of your vanity apps and start gutting it on a dare. A federal judge has basically said there’s no way around deposing him: as Trump’s hand‑picked head of the so‑called Department of Government Efficiency, Musk is accused of driving the dismantling of USAID — shutting down one of the world’s largest aid operations even though he didn’t have the formal authority to do it and never produced a serious policy justification beyond “waste” and vibes. Former USAID staff and contractors are suing, and the judge flat‑out wrote that “extraordinary circumstances” justify forcing Musk and top DOGE/State people to sit for questioning about how and why this all went down, including why the headquarters and website were abruptly shuttered. This isn’t some routine oversight hearing — it’s the court saying: you blew up a life‑saving agency off the books, and now you’re going to have to explain yourself under oath.
The really sick part is what these cuts actually mean in human terms, and it completely blows up Musk’s smug line about “zero people have died” from his USAID rampage. Health researchers have been sounding the alarm for a year now: analyses tied specifically to the USAID reductions project roughly 500,000 to 1,000,000 additional deaths in 2025 alone, with future years in the same ballpark — on the order of 670,000 to 1.6 million extra deaths annually if the cuts hold. One Lancet‑linked modeling effort and follow‑up work from global health groups estimate that keeping USAID dismantled through 2030 could drive about 14 million additional deaths worldwide, including around 4.5 million children, mostly from things like HIV, malaria, TB, hunger, and basic preventable diseases. When you zoom out to the broader wave of global aid cuts that Trump and Musk helped trigger, some scenarios run as high as 23 million avoidable deaths by 2030. Even the more conservative, USAID‑specific estimates are horrifying: one academic analysis tied the current USAID cuts to at least hundreds of thousands of deaths from halted programs, and public health economists say that number is likely on the low end.
So when Musk marches into this deposition, he’s not just answering for some procedural screw‑up or a budget tweak — he’s answering for decisions that researchers say are on track to kill millions of people who would otherwise be alive, many of them kids, because vaccines weren’t delivered, HIV meds weren’t funded, mosquito nets never showed up, and clinics lost their lifeline overnight. And the wild thing is, they did all this while pretending it was just “efficiency,” as if you can quietly delete the agency that underpinned huge chunks of global health and development work and somehow that doesn’t have a body count.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Epstein Depositions…
The Maxwell and Clinton pieces of this Epstein mess could not be more different, and the way the Trump crew is handling it screams cover‑up from a mile away. Ghislaine Maxwell is rolling into her House Oversight deposition planning to plead the Fifth in a blanket, wall‑to‑wall way — not question by question, but with a prewritten statement saying she’s not answering anything of substance about Epstein, his network, or his powerful friends. Lawmakers like Ro Khanna have already said on the record that they wanted to ask her directly whether she or Epstein ever provided underage girls to Trump, whether Epstein kept a client list, and whether any of this tied into foreign intelligence services — and she’s choosing to shut down all of it rather than risk putting anything on the record. So instead of using one of the few living people who really knows what went on to finally tell the truth, the Trump‑run apparatus is giving her a safe, closed‑door lane to say “no comment” to everything while they pretend that counts as accountability.
Meanwhile, look at the Clintons: whatever you think of them, they’re at least saying, “Fine, bring it on — but do it in public.” Hillary and Bill Clinton were first threatened with contempt for not complying fast enough, but they ultimately agreed to sit for depositions on February 26 and 27 and have pushed for their testimony to be in the open with cameras, not tucked away in some closed, selectively leaked session. Hillary straight‑up called out Republicans on Oversight, basically saying: you love to talk about transparency, so let’s do this out in the sunlight, because that’s the only way victims and the public actually get the truth. Bill Clinton has echoed that, asking who benefits from keeping this behind closed doors and making it clear that he wants the full DOJ Epstein files released, not cherry‑picked. So on one side you have a convicted trafficker refusing every question, protected by process, and on the other you have two former high‑profile officials saying “put us on the record where everyone can see it.”
As for the five people lined up for depositions, the picture is ugly and it absolutely looks like Trump world trying to control the narrative rather than expose the truth. At the center you’ve got:
• Ghislaine Maxwell, the trafficker in chief, scheduled for a virtual House Oversight deposition and planning to plead the Fifth across the board.
• Hillary Clinton, subpoenaed and now set for a closed‑door deposition on February 26 about her ties, travel, and any interactions related to Epstein.
• Bill Clinton, scheduled the very next day, February 27, for the same committee, also under oath and also asking for the testimony to be public and recorded.
• Senior DOJ officials responsible for handling the Epstein files and prior non‑prosecution deals, who are being quietly pulled in to explain why so many documents are still hidden and why the original sweetheart deal protected “potential co‑conspirators.”
• Intelligence or State‑linked officials with knowledge of Epstein’s foreign connections, including whether he ever operated as a cutout or asset for foreign governments, which lawmakers like Khanna have said they want answers on.
And yet, with all that, Trump’s administration and his House allies are doing everything they can to keep the spotlight away from themselves and their guy, who is named thousands of times in the newer Epstein document dumps. They are fine dragging the Clintons in for a made‑for‑Fox spectacle but then suddenly get camera‑shy the minute those same hearings might involve unredacted files that connect to Trump, foreign money, or GOP donors. They let Maxwell hide behind the Fifth instead of pushing for immunity in exchange for real answers, they slow‑walk the unsealing of the full files at DOJ, and they keep insisting on closed‑door formats where they control what leaks and what mysteriously “can’t be discussed.” That’s not a good‑faith search for the truth; that’s a containment operation. And the fact that the one person who could expose the full client web is being allowed to say nothing, while the one ex‑presidential couple actually asking for public testimony is being boxed into private depositions, tells you everything about how deep this cover‑up runs inside Trump’s Washington.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Court Rulings Update
There actually were some big legal moves this weekend, and a couple more coming that matter for how much power Trump and his people get to throw around without anyone stopping them.
One of the biggest concrete rulings that just dropped was from the 5th Circuit, and it’s a nasty one: a panel there signed off on Trump’s policy of locking immigrants up indefinitely with no chance at a bond hearing, even if they’ve lived here for years and have no criminal record. The court basically bought DHS’s claim that “unadmitted aliens apprehended anywhere in the United States” can be detained without bond, period, which flips almost 30 years of practice under both parties and slams the door on people seeing a judge to argue for release while their cases play out. One of the judges dissented and spelled out exactly what this means: we’re talking about possibly two million people, many of them spouses, parents, and grandparents of U.S. citizens, being subject to mandatory detention purely because the executive branch decided that’s what the law “really” means now. So on immigration, at least in that circuit, Trump just got a green light to keep running a jail‑first, ask‑questions‑later system.
On the flip side, other parts of the judiciary are clearly getting fed up with Trump’s power grabs. A fresh district court ruling out of the Pacific Northwest just became another big loss for his attempt to rewrite election rules by executive order — the judge blocked key pieces of his election “integrity” order, including the parts that tried to force proof‑of‑citizenship for federal voter registration and throw out absentee ballots that arrive after Election Day even if they’re postmarked on time. The judge said point‑blank that the Constitution does not give the president authority to do this and that federal law doesn’t either, and framed the ruling as restoring the proper balance of power between Congress and the White House. That makes at least three different federal courts that have now slapped down major planks of Trump’s election order, which tells you the legal system is not nearly as impressed with his “I alone can fix it” routine as he is.
There’s also a new order out of federal court in Georgia that’s going to drag more of Trump’s election‑policing antics into the light. A judge just told the administration it has to hand over the internal records and intelligence it claims justified that heavy‑handed “elections fraud” raid on Fulton County officials — the same county that’s been a constant target for MAGA conspiracy theories. The ruling doesn’t decide the whole case yet, but it forces the government to stop hiding behind vague “security” excuses and actually show what they had, if anything, that made them think storming a local elections office was legitimate. Given how often “fraud” has turned out to mean “Black voters we don’t trust,” that could get ugly for them fast.
At the Supreme Court level, we’re in that weird zone where the big bombs are still ticking but haven’t gone off yet. The justices have already posted their calendars and are lining up arguments in huge Trump‑era cases this term — things like his emergency tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, his attempts to fire independent regulators, and a GOP challenge to campaign finance limits tied to JD Vance — but those rulings are still a bit down the road. We also know they’re going to conference later this month on Trump’s Hail Mary bid to get them to erase the E. Jean Carroll verdict, which, if they actually took it up and bailed him out, would be a massive earthquake in its own right. So this week is more about the lower courts shaping the battlefield — green‑lighting Trump on immigration detention in one place, smacking him down on elections in another — while everyone watches to see which way the Supreme Court decides to lean when the really explosive Trump cases finally hit.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Justice Department to allow Lawmakers to see unredacted Epstein Files
This move from the Justice Department is a big deal on paper, but the way they’re doing it shows you exactly how hard the system is still fighting to control the damage instead of actually ripping this thing open. Starting today, members of Congress can go into a DOJ reading room in D.C. and look at unredacted versions of more than 3 million Epstein‑related documents — the same ones they already dumped online with black bars everywhere, but now without the censor strips. It’s tightly managed: lawmakers have to book time at least 24 hours in advance, no phones, no staff, no copies, just them at a DOJ computer from 9 to 6, taking notes by hand like it’s 1973. And for now this is limited to the 3‑plus million pages already “released,” not the full 6‑million‑document pile DOJ admits it has, and definitely not everything they’ve withheld under things like deliberative‑process privilege and attorney‑client privilege. So yes, it’s more access — but it’s controlled, chaperoned access, designed to say “See, we’re transparent!” while keeping them as far as possible from walking out with a complete, public picture.
Could seeing everything be the beginning of the end? In theory, absolutely — if even a handful of members really dig in, connect the dots, and then choose to blow the whistle instead of playing team politics, these files could be devastating for a lot of powerful people. The whole reason Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie pushed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in the first place was because they suspected DOJ was hiding things, especially around who decided not to pursue certain leads or co‑conspirators. The unredacted material can show names, timelines, internal emails, and decision memos — who was protected, who got tipped off, which “associates” skated, and how many times prosecutors and the FBI looked the other way. If lawmakers see evidence that Trump, his allies, or top officials in his administration pressured DOJ to bury certain names or hold back specific cases, that’s the kind of thing that can crack an administration open, especially when you layer it on top of Ghislaine Maxwell pleading the Fifth and the Clintons pushing for public testimony.
But here’s the reality check: this only becomes “the beginning of the end” if Congress actually uses what they learn, instead of treating this like a field trip and then leaking whatever helps their side while burying the rest. DOJ has already shown its instincts — heavy redactions, dragging its feet, and refusing to release about half the total documents it says exist, while claiming it’s all about protecting victims and legal privileges. They’re now telling lawmakers, “Sure, come look,” but under rules that make it harder to systematically review, share, or organize what’s there, and they’re still carving out at least 200,000 pages behind various privilege walls. Trump is already snapping at reporters to “move on” when Epstein questions come up, which tells you exactly how nervous this makes him, and his people will absolutely try to spin or stonewall whatever comes out of these reading‑room sessions. So yes, this could be the start of something huge — but only if some members of Congress decide they’re more loyal to the truth and the victims than to their party or their own exposure, and actually drag what they see in that room out into the light.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Independent Journalist…connecting the dots
What the independent folks have been doing — Ben Meiselas, smaller investigative pods, the scattered nerds who actually read these PDFs — is basically stitching together the picture the establishment keeps pretending isn’t there, and it’s ugly as hell. They’re not claiming every line is proven in court, but they’re showing how much is already sitting in plain sight if you bother to connect it.
One of the biggest dots they’ve hammered is Epstein as more than just a “pervert financier,” but as a guy sitting at the intersection of money, kompromat, and foreign power — especially Russia, Israel, and the Gulf states. In the new files, you have an FBI source literally describing Epstein as Vladimir Putin’s “wealth manager,” saying he handled money not just for Putin but for people like Mugabe, and pointing out emails where Epstein is gleefully talking about “opportunities” after Russia’s annexation of Crimea while writing to a Rothschild banker. You also see email traffic where Epstein is arranging or talking about meetings tied to Putin with people like former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and ultra‑wealthy figures in the UAE, which is not what a random hedge‑fund creep does — that’s what a fixer does.
Then there’s the Israel/Mossad/Chabad/Kushner axis that independent reporters have been circling for years and that the new FBI memo just threw gasoline on. That 2020 FBI write‑up from a confidential human source — the one DOJ buried until now — includes allegations that: Trump was “compromised by Israel,” Chabad was trying to “co‑opt the Trump presidency,” and Jared Kushner was the main conduit, moving Russian investment money through charities and networks tied into both Israel and Russia. The same source says point‑blank that Epstein “belonged to intelligence,” specifically including Israeli intelligence, that he trained as a spy figure under Ehud Barak, and that people like Alan Dershowitz told prosecutors Epstein “belonged to intelligence” when they were pushing that sweetheart deal in 2008. You don’t have to accept every word as gospel to see why that’s damning: if even a fraction is true, you’re looking at a web where sex trafficking, kompromat, and foreign state leverage over U.S. officials are all braided together.
Independent folks have also been mapping how this connects straight into Trump world — not with one “smoking gun” photo, but with a pattern of money, access, and cover. You’ve got the known social ties: Trump and Epstein partying together at Mar‑a‑Lago, Trump bragging on tape about Epstein liking them “on the younger side,” staffers from his club showing up in the victim narratives. In the document dumps, you see emails between Epstein and people in Trump’s orbit, references to a Mar‑a‑Lago worker accusing Trump of assault as a teen, and Ghislaine Maxwell telling Epstein, “I thought you said not to involve Donald,” when he asks about whether Trump will respond to specific allegations. At the same time, you’ve got Trump jumping on Truth Social to say “time for the country to move on” and rant about “sleazebags” who gave Epstein money — which sounds an awful lot like a guy who knows there’s more in those files than what we’ve seen.
On the money side, MeidasTouch and others have been pointing to how many of the same names keep popping up across Epstein, Russian and Gulf money, and Trump: oligarch‑adjacent bankers in Europe, UAE megadonors, Tom Barrack and the Emirates, people tied into World Economic Forum circles, and then back into Trump fundraising and real‑estate deals. The DOJ dump shows Epstein emailing with Elon Musk, Richard Branson, Cantor Fitzgerald’s Howard Lutnick, WEF president Børge Brende, Bill Gates and more — some of whom already have separate Russia or Gulf entanglements that journalists have documented for years. None of that proves they’re all part of some single master plot, but it absolutely destroys the idea that this was just “one guy and some girls on a private island.” This was a social and financial hub for the global 1%, including people who had reason to hold leverage on U.S. power.
The reason it all feels so damning is the pattern: every time you follow the trail, it leads back to the same overlapping circles — Russian influence, Israeli political and intelligence networks, Gulf money (especially UAE and Qatar), Western billionaires, and a Trump ecosystem that constantly seems to be standing in the middle of it all, yelling “witch hunt” any time someone asks a real question. You’ve got an FBI source saying Epstein was managing Putin’s money and working as an intelligence asset, you’ve got a separate FBI source saying Trump was compromised and Kushner was moving suspect Russian funds through religious and charitable fronts, you’ve got emails tying Epstein to world leaders and Gulf oligarchs, and you’ve got a long trail of mysteriously lenient deals, dead witnesses, and “we may never know” shrugs from officials who clearly didn’t want to pull the thread. That’s why independent journalists keep banging on this: because when you zoom out, it doesn’t look like random coincidence — it looks like a protection racket shielding a global blackmail and influence operation, with Trump and his crew sitting right on top of some of the most toxic pieces.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Power of our Independent Journalist
Independent journalists have basically become the emergency braking system for this country while the mainstream press keeps trying to drive with both feet on the gas and the brake at the same time. Outlets and creators like MeidasTouch, Brian Tyler Cohen, ProPublica, Democracy Now!, and a whole universe of progressive YouTube and podcast reporters stepped into the void that corporate TV and “both sides” newspapers either couldn’t or wouldn’t fill. They’re not pretending to be neutral about whether democracy survives, so they actually say the quiet parts out loud: they call Trump a liar when he lies, explain why something is flat‑out unlawful instead of hiding behind “critics say,” and stay on a story long after mainstream cameras move on to the next shiny object.
What makes them so powerful is that they’re doing the slow, boring work and then translating it into plain English with receipts. MeidasTouch and others are walking through filings, depositions, Epstein documents, DOGE/USAID rulings, election cases — line by line — and then turning that into videos and threads that explain exactly how Trump’s people are breaking the law or gaming the system. They’re the ones who pause the speech, pull the statute, show you the docket, and say, “No, this part right here is the illegal part,” while mainstream outlets are still writing paragraphs about “controversial remarks” like it’s all just vibes. That’s why they’ve exploded in reach — MeidasTouch literally rivals Joe Rogan numbers now — because people who are exhausted and scared want someone to actually connect dots, not just dump quotes.
And yeah, it feels slow, because this is trench warfare against a regime and a propaganda machine, not some Netflix‑style takedown with a season finale. But look at what’s actually shifted: independent media have kept constant pressure on Trump’s lies about the election, on his abuse of the DOJ, on his pardons and commutations, on his foreign entanglements, on the way his administration is trying to muzzle and sue the press into submission. They’ve helped build the public record that judges, watchdogs, and even some mainstream reporters now lean on — the constant fact‑checks, the timelines of his false claims, the breakdowns of how his executive orders shred existing law. When Trump screams “fake news” and launches a government “media bias” portal to target reporters, he’s doing it because he knows this independent ecosystem is actually breaking through and teaching people how to see the con in real time.
So while it might feel like molasses, their impact is massive: they’ve kept a big chunk of the country from getting fully swallowed by Trump’s alternate reality, they’ve armed regular people with enough information to push back at the dinner table and at the ballot box, and they’ve refused to let the worst abuses get memory‑holed the way so many did after past administrations. In a moment where the White House is openly trying to brand any real reporting as “fake” and punish it, independent journalists have been the ones saying, “Nope, here’s the law, here’s the document, here’s the lie — and here’s why it matters,” over and over, until the truth sticks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Happy Monday – gonna be another week of crazy – brace for impact!
Speak Truth! Keep speaking TRUTH!
Don’t Give up the Ship!
Go Cause Good Trouble, with Your Elbows Up!
These are facts that I researched and verified – AI helped put together some sentence structure, but the words and tone are mine. These are my views based upon facts, research and thoughtful consideration using logic. I own the copyright to any images used. I’m comfortable to stand alone to uphold truth. Feel free to check me, but do not attack me. I am only causing good trouble.