What Happened Today - 22 Jan 2026
What Happened Today – 22 January 2026
Jack Smith Testimony today
Karoline and “best speech ever” review (Trump @Davos)
Greenland “Framework” plan
MAGA explosion over picture of Newsom and Soros
Vance in Minneapolis today
Trump’s “Board of Peace”
Trump’s private meeting with CEO’s at Davos
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jack Smith Testimony today
Jack Smith went up to the Hill today, sat in front of Jim Jordan’s circus of a committee, and basically told them he’d do it all over again because, in his view, Trump flat‑out broke the law and there was real, serious evidence to back it up.
Smith’s whole vibe was calm, lawyerly, and totally unbothered by the Republican performative outrage. He opened by stressing that he’s not a politician, has no partisan loyalty to anybody, and that his team found “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” that Trump engaged in criminal activity in both the Jan. 6 election subversion case and the classified documents mess at Mar‑a‑Lago. He hammered the point that Trump was charged because the evidence showed he “willfully broke the law” he swore to uphold, not because of who he is or what party he belongs to.
Republicans mostly avoided the actual substance of Trump’s conduct and instead tried to nail Smith on process—timelines, charging decisions, internal DOJ procedures, the usual technical gotcha stuff meant for clips on right‑wing media rather than real oversight. Smith didn’t bite; he stuck to the line that the investigations followed the facts and the law, refused to say he regretted bringing the cases, and reminded them that no one is above the law, even a president who managed to win again.
Democrats used their time to basically give Smith a platform to walk through how serious Trump’s conduct was, especially around Jan. 6 and the effort to overturn the 2020 results. They also called out the whole hearing as political theater designed to rewrite the history of the attack on the Capitol, and even pointed to the officers in the room who actually defended the building that day as the counter to the GOP’s revisionist spin.
Smith also made it crystal clear he expects Trump’s Justice Department to come after him personally, saying he fully anticipates they’ll “do everything in their power” to prosecute him because that’s what the president wants. Still, he said he “will not be intimidated” by Trump’s threats or the smear campaign, and he pushed back hard on what he called “false and misleading narratives” about his team being corrupt or political. Outside the room, Trump was already raging, accusing Smith of perjury with zero evidence, which just underlined Smith’s whole point about the president using raw political power and propaganda to go after people who tried to hold him accountable.
In the room, the Jan. 6 cops and defenders were basically the moral center of the whole thing, even if Republicans pretended they weren’t there. Guys like Michael Fanone, Harry Dunn, Aquilino Gonell, and Daniel Hodges showed up to back Smith and to make it clear that no hearing stunt was ever going to erase what was done to them and to the Capitol that day. Gonell flat out said this is about accountability and betrayal, not spin, and Raskin even opened by welcoming them, drawing a bright line between the people who actually bled to defend the building and the people trying to rewrite history from the dais.
Emotions boiled over during a recess when Fanone got into it with a pro‑insurrection election denier in the audience, to the point where Capitol Police had to step in and physically separate them. Fanone was heard yelling that this guy was threatening his kids and saying vile stuff, and Harry Dunn had to help pull him back while officers restored order before the hearing restarted. Out in the broader J6 orbit, you even had Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes—fresh off a commutation from Trump—sitting there talking about “transparency” like he wasn’t convicted of seditious conspiracy, which just showed how upside‑down this whole Trump‑era reality is.
Afterward, the reactions broke exactly how you’d expect: Trump-world screaming witch hunt and perjury, demanding his new DOJ go after Smith, while Smith’s allies and a lot of the Jan. 6 community framed the day as finally getting the story told in public that he never got to finish in court. Smith himself kept the same line he used in the room—he said he’d make the same call again if presented with the same facts, and that he will not be intimidated by a president openly talking about using the Justice Department to get revenge on him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karoline and “best speech ever” review (Trump @Davos)
Karoline went full cult-defense mode over Trump’s Davos word salad, and honestly it was embarrassing even by this White House’s standards. On Fox, she sat there with a straight face and claimed his rambling, confused Greenland–Iceland rant “got rave reviews” and was “inspirational,” like we all didn’t just watch him bungle basic geography in front of the entire planet. She gushed that he struck this uplifting tone and laid out some grand “America First” vision, talking up deregulation, “drill, baby, drill,” and how world leaders were supposedly blown away by his brilliance, while the actual coverage from everywhere outside the MAGA bubble was that the speech was erratic, incoherent, and low-key alarming.
Then she jumped on X and made it even worse by flat-out lying about what people heard with their own ears. Reporters pointed out—correctly—that Trump repeatedly mixed up Iceland and Greenland in the speech, and Karoline’s response was basically, “No he didn’t,” insisting he was just calling Greenland a “piece of ice” and that the media was the one “mixing things up,” while the transcript and clips show him using the wrong country name four different times. She doubled down instead of backing off, turning what should have been an easy “yeah, he misspoke” clean-up into a full gaslighting operation where the official White House line is that reality is wrong and Dear Leader is flawless.
Outside the Fox bubble, people shredded her for it—she’s getting dragged for sounding less like a press secretary and more like a spokesperson for a personality cult, because that’s exactly what this is. Commentators and reporters have been pointing out that her defense wasn’t just spin, it was pure denial: pretending the gaffe never happened, calling the speech “historic” and “widely praised,” and painting any criticism as proof the “failing liberal media” is melting down while Trump heroically tries to buy a chunk of the Arctic. It’s the same tired playbook every time—Trump rants, the world cringes, and Karoline stomps out to the podium or logs into X to tell everyone their lying eyes are the problem, not the guy who can’t keep two basic countries straight.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Greenland “Framework” Plan
Trump’s so‑called “new plan” for Greenland is basically him trying to spin a nothingburger into some epic, world‑changing master deal, when in reality it’s a fuzzy “framework” that mostly repackages stuff the U.S. already has and dangles a bunch of vague future promises on top of it. At Davos he bragged that, after a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, they’d agreed to a “framework of a future deal” that would supposedly give the U.S. “total access” to Greenland and the wider Arctic “forever,” complete with security guarantees, mineral rights, and this bizarre “Golden Dome” missile‑defense fantasy he keeps talking about. The catch is Denmark and Greenland have not agreed to sell him anything, have repeated that sovereignty is not on the table, and what’s actually being discussed sounds way more like expanded NATO security cooperation and base access layered on top of the 1951 deal the U.S. already has, not some Trump‑branded land grab.
On paper, his “framework” hits a few buckets: more U.S. and NATO military presence in the Arctic, possibly more or larger bases; long‑term access to rare earths and other critical minerals if Greenland ever relaxes its own tight rules; and a joint role for the U.S. and allies in whatever this “Golden Dome” missile shield is supposed to be. He’s selling it on TV like it’s “Israel times 100” in strategic impact and claiming it locks in permanent U.S. rights, but European officials are already quietly saying there’s no signed deal, details are wide open, and anything that touches Greenland’s land or resources still has to get past Denmark, Greenland’s government, and locals who are not thrilled about being turned into Trump’s Arctic playground. The only concrete thing he’s clearly backed off is his threat to slap tariffs on a bunch of European allies over Greenland, which he suddenly dropped once he could declare fake victory and announce this “ultimate long‑term deal” on social media.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MAGA explosion over picture of Newsom and Soros
MAGA is losing its mind over a totally normal Davos grip‑and‑grin between Gavin Newsom and Alex Soros, and turning it into their latest “globalist puppet” conspiracy fanfic. Alex, who now runs a lot of his father George Soros’ operation, posted a pic on Instagram of the two of them smiling at Davos with a caption basically calling Newsom the “real star” of the forum and praising him for calling out world leaders who are rolling over for Trump.
That one photo is all the right needed to go full tinfoil. Fox, the Post, and the usual MAGA influencers are blasting it everywhere, calling Newsom Soros’s “sugar baby,” “bond villain,” and acting like this is proof he’s bought and paid for by some shadowy globalist cabal. Ted Cruz even jumped in with an AI‑edited version of the pic where Newsom is wearing a NASCAR‑style jumpsuit covered in “Soros” and “CCP” sponsor logos, just to feed the base more red meat.
What’s really going on is simple: a high‑profile Democratic governor who openly trashes Trump is seen with a mega‑donor the right has demonized for years, and MAGA is milking it for content. They’re using that single Davos selfie to scream about “Soros money,” global elites, and how Newsom is supposedly plotting some woke takeover of America, when in reality it’s just one more rich‑guy‑meets‑politician photo being spun into the apocalypse by people who live off outrage clicks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Vance in Minneapolis today
Vance flew into Minneapolis today to do a full “law and order” pep rally for ICE in the middle of a community that is still furious and grieving over Renee Good being shot and killed by an ICE officer, and he made it very clear whose side he’s on. He stood in front of a wall of agents and SUVs and painted them as the real victims, saying they’re “doing an incredible job,” insisting crime is down because of the raids, and blaming all the chaos on “far‑left” local leaders who won’t cooperate with ICE or hand over things like court records and SNAP data so the feds can track people down more easily. He went out of his way to defend some of the ugliest stuff, including the detention of a 5‑year‑old boy and the church‑disrupting arrests, saying protesters who “storm a church” or “insult” or “surround” agents are going to prison if he has anything to say about it, while also trying to sound reasonable by claiming he’s there to “tone down the temperature” and that Trump doesn’t “currently” need the Insurrection Act.
On the right, this was exactly what they wanted from him: conservative media and ICE boosters are eating it up, praising him for showing his face in a hot zone, hammering “sanctuary city chaos,” and backing agents after weeks of bad headlines about shootings, pepper‑spraying, and kids being hauled off in raids. They’re amplifying his line that the “real problem” is liberal officials telling cops to “stand down” and “coddling” protesters, and cheering his threat that if you lay a hand on a federal officer, the administration will “use every resource of the federal government to put you in prison.”
On the left and on the ground in Minneapolis, people are furious and not buying his “de‑escalation” act for a second. Local officials and organizers are calling the visit pure political theater and retaliation, saying he flew in to stage a backdrop with armed agents instead of meeting seriously with families, and pointing out he didn’t even bother to sit down with Gov. Walz while lecturing Minnesotans about “cooperation.” Activists who’ve been tear‑gassed and arrested in these raids are out there saying exactly what it looks like: Vance is talking about “reducing chaos” while defending the same federal operation that killed Renee Good, detained a kindergartner, and turned neighborhoods into a militarized zone, and his little visit just hardened people’s resolve to keep resisting this crackdown.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trump’s “Board of Peace”
Trump’s so‑called Board of Peace is basically a vanity shadow-UN built around his ego, stacked with his loyalists and some deeply sketchy “partners,” and it screams alignment with the wrong side of damn near every conflict out there.
At the top, Trump made himself permanent chair, with an executive board that’s pure Trumpworld plus a few establishment figures for cover: Marco Rubio as secretary of state frontman, Jared Kushner back in the mix, Trump donor and “peace envoy” Steve Witkoff, former UK PM Tony Blair, World Bank president Ajay Banga, big-money financier Marc Rowan, and a couple of other handpicked insiders. The charter literally gives Trump veto power over decisions, control of the agenda, the ability to invite or boot members, and even influence over who succeeds him, so this isn’t some neutral peace body—it’s his personal foreign‑policy franchise dressed up as a global do‑good project.
Who’s signing up tells you everything. A bunch of U.S.-aligned monarchies and strongmen are on board—Israel under Netanyahu, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Morocco, plus countries like Turkey and Hungary whose leaders are cozy with Trump and love the idea of bypassing the usual human‑rights noise. He’s also courting or inviting players like Belarus’s Lukashenko, and talking openly about bringing in Russia, China, Iran, Sudan, and Syria as “partners” in resolving conflicts, which means the board is structurally set up to give serial abusers and aggressors a seat at the “peace” table without requiring any accountability.
The problem is this thing isn’t just some harmless side hustle—it cuts straight against what’s left of the traditional U.S. position and lines us up with the people doing the damage instead of the people taking the hits. The charter drops Gaza entirely even though it was sold as a Gaza mechanism, and Trump is now saying the board can “do pretty much whatever we want,” which sounds a lot more like a vehicle for cutting sweetheart deals with authoritarians over territory, reconstruction contracts, and “security” than anything resembling real conflict resolution. Major European allies like France, Norway, and Sweden are already passing, quietly saying they don’t see the point of a Trump‑run alternative to the UN—that’s diplomatic‑speak for “this is a captured outfit that tilts toward Russia, China, and their friends, and we’re not touching it.”
Put bluntly, when you build a “peace” club where Trump has final say, his son‑in‑law is in the back room, Gulf royals and Netanyahu are smiling for the cameras, Lukashenko is welcomed, and Russia and China are being courted while core democracies stay away, it doesn’t look like peace—it looks like a cartel of power players carving up leverage while the U.S. brand gets dragged right alongside some of the worst regimes on the planet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trump’s private meeting with CEO’s at Davos
Trump’s big “private” CEO huddle at Davos was exactly what it looked like: a power‑flex behind closed doors where he worked the room for loyalty, investment, and validation while everyone pretended this was just about the economy.
He pulled together a who’s‑who list of global money people—top bank and asset‑management chiefs, heavyweights from energy, AI, and defense, plus big Indian and European CEOs who were part of a 100‑plus invite list for his closed‑door session and the follow‑on reception. Think people in the orbit of Jamie Dimon–type Wall Street, top Indian industrialists like Tata and Bharti, AI and data‑center players, and assorted billionaires who all suddenly cleared their calendars to make sure they were in the room when Trump walked in.
Inside, the pitch was pure Trump: he hammered his “America First” line, bragged about tariffs as a weapon that supposedly made the U.S. rich, promised even more deregulation, and sold them on massive U.S. build‑outs—energy, AI power, infrastructure—if they play ball and keep the money flowing into the U.S. on his terms. Greenland and tariffs were there in the background too; CEOs were clearly trying to figure out how to talk about trade, climate, and Arctic stuff without pissing him off, because they know one angry Truth Social post can tank their stock or get them dragged into a tariff tantrum.
Is it shady? It’s at least gross. You’ve got the president holding effectively off‑the‑record audiences with the people who have the most to gain from tax cuts, deregulation, and inside knowledge about where his administration is headed on tariffs, energy, and Greenland, and they’re literally skipping their own company events just to stay on his good side. The cherry on top is who gets frozen out—Bank of America’s Brian Moynihan, for example, was pointedly left off the guest list after Trump feuded with him over “de‑banking conservatives,” which sends a loud message: praise him and you’re in the room, cross him and you’re outside in the snow. So no, it’s not illegal on its face, but it sure as hell looks like access and policy vibes being traded in a back room where regular people, regulators, and even some big players only hear about it after the deals and understandings are already socially locked in.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trump and the FCC want MORE control over media
Trump’s latest tantrum about late night TV has turned into an actual policy move, and it’s one of those things that sounds technical on the surface but is fundamentally about punishing criticism and chilling speech.
He’s been raging for years that Kimmel, Colbert, Meyers, Fallon, and “The View” are “anti‑Trump” and “Democrat Party TV,” and now his FCC chair Brendan Carr is doing him a favor by dusting off an old “equal time” rule and trying to slam it onto late‑night and daytime talk shows. The new guidance says that if these shows give on‑air time to a political candidate, they’re supposed to give “equal opportunities” to opponents—meaning interviews, appearances, and even some monologue‑style political content can trigger a requirement to bring on the other side or risk complaints and regulatory trouble. Up to now, late‑night and most talk shows have been treated as entertainment, basically exempt from this rule; Carr is now saying, nope, they might be “partisan platforms,” so exemptions won’t be automatic and will be decided case by case.
Why is this so dangerous? First, it’s not about fairness, it’s about control. Trump has repeatedly floated yanking broadcast licenses from networks that are too negative about him and cheered when ABC briefly suspended Kimmel over a monologue—it’s all part of the same obsession with using state power to intimidate critics. When the president is loudly demanding the FCC “do something” about shows that make fun of him, and then his handpicked chair rolls out guidance that explicitly calls them out and invites complaints, that’s not neutral regulation, that’s the government leaning on the referee to rig the game.
Second, this puts a legal bullseye on satire and commentary, which are supposed to be some of the safest forms of political speech in a free country. The lone Democratic FCC commissioner is already warning this is a backdoor censorship campaign, telling broadcasters not to “sanitize” or avoid critical content just because they’re scared of retaliation. But fear is the point: if every time you book a Democrat, mock Trump, or talk about an election you risk triggering an “equal time” complaint or a license fight, the path of least resistance for networks will be to water everything down or stop touching politics at all.
Finally, once you accept the idea that the president and his appointees can use obscure broadcast rules to micromanage who gets mocked and who gets invited on air, there’s no real limiting principle. Today it’s late night and “The View”; tomorrow it’s local radio, streaming deals, or demands that newsrooms “prove” they’re not biased to keep their spectrum. It’s the classic authoritarian play: wrap censorship in “fairness,” pretend you’re protecting the public, and quietly teach everyone with a platform that crossing the president can cost them their job, their show, or their license
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I actually have MORE topics, but that’s enough for one day. It’s a lot – stay aware, keep using your voices. This is OUR country.
Speak Truth! Keep speaking TRUTH!
Don’t Give up the Ship!
Go Cause Good Trouble, with Your Elbows Up!
These are facts that I researched and verified – AI helped put together some sentence structure, but the words and tone are mine. These are my views based upon facts, research and thoughtful consideration using logic. I own the copyright to any images used. I’m comfortable to stand alone to uphold truth. Feel free to check me, but do not attack me. I am only causing good trouble.