What Happened Today - 10 March 2026
What Happened Today – 10 Mar 2026
Iran Update
ICE Update
Erika Kirk – USAFA Board of Visitors
Anthropic vs. The Pentagon
Ticketmaster…DOJ screwing us again
Promises Made…and Broken
GOP Infighting
House Oversight…what’s next
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Iran Update
Iran right now is a mess of escalating violence, open threats, and straight-up war profiteering wrapped in a patriotic bow, and they’re barely even pretending otherwise.
Hegseth is out there this morning bragging that today is going to be “yet again our most intense day of strikes inside Iran,” talking about the most fighters, most bombers, most targets hit, like he’s calling a football game instead of ordering mass death from behind a podium. He and Gen. Dan Caine are boasting that we’ve already hit thousands of targets and “reduced” Iran’s missile launches by around 90%, like that somehow makes this whole thing controlled and responsible instead of a full-blown regional war they kicked off by taking out Khamenei.
On the Iran side, the “surprises” language is basically them saying: we might not be able to hit the U.S. mainland with big, flashy strikes, but we absolutely can bleed you and your allies everywhere else. U.S. intel is already warning that Iran and its proxies are more likely to go for targeted stuff: cyber hits on networks, hacktivist-style disruptions, maybe lone-wolf or sleeper-cell type operations or small cells targeting soft or symbolic sites, plus going after U.S. bases and partners across the Middle East and Gulf. So, for the homeland, the assessment right now is: major 9/11-style attack is “unlikely,” but persistent, low-level, ugly risk is “likely” and ongoing, and it ramps up every time Trump and Hegseth dial up the bombing and the regime-change talk. Overseas, our troops and contractors are the bullseye: bases in the Gulf, Iraq, Syria, anywhere we’ve parked people or hardware is fair game, and Iran’s already been firing missiles and drones at U.S.-linked sites and trying to squeeze shipping and energy flows through Hormuz to crank global pain and force the U.S. and Israel to back off.
And then there’s the grift side of this, which is just obscene. Oil prices and war headlines are bouncing around, and Trump is on Truth Social pushing this “no deal except unconditional surrender” line while tying it to some fantasy future where Iran is “great” if they just lay down and let him win, which is exactly the kind of chaos-and-fear messaging that moves markets and lets insiders front-run the news. At the same time, the online betting and prediction market stuff around this war is straight-up grotesque: platforms like Polymarket saw hundreds of millions in bets on whether and when the U.S. would strike Iran, and one account literally named “Magamyman” turned an ~$87k position into more than half a million dollars in a day by betting on the timing of the strikes just over an hour before it became public. Multiple fresh wallets, opened right before the attack, all focused narrowly on Iran strike bets, collectively pulled in seven figures off this, and those trades started when the public odds were still low, which screams insider knowledge, not “lucky guess.”
It gets worse when you look at who’s tied into these platforms: Trump Jr. is on Polymarket’s advisory board and his venture fund has poured tens of millions into the company, and the federal investigations into this stuff magically got shut down once Trump was back in power. You’ve also got separate reporting flagging clusters of anonymous accounts that seem linked to Trump’s inner orbit making big money off timing the Iran strikes, with people in D.C. restaurants literally chatting about the bombing hours before it was public, which means this was circulating as gossip and effectively as a trading tip before the missiles even flew. Put that together with the fact that these strikes killed kids and civilians as “collateral” and you’re looking at a scenario where people close to the administration almost certainly knew when the operation would start, watched those deaths as an input into their betting strategy, and turned it into profit while the White House wrapped the whole thing in flags and talking points.
So yeah, Iran’s talking “surprises,” the official line says the big-apocalypse attack on the homeland is unlikely but the steady, creeping threat is basically baked in now, our troops and bases overseas are sitting under a constant shadow, and the people at the top are using that same danger and bloodshed as another way to juice the markets and let their friends and family cash out. It’s the same Trump formula every time: crank up the chaos, promise total victory, shrug off the dead kids, and make damn sure the right people have their chips on the table before he flips it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ICE Update
ICE hasn’t slowed down just because the Iran war is sucking up all the oxygen; they’re still out here terrorizing people, and it’s actually getting deadlier, just with less camera time.
Behind the scenes, Trump’s second-term machine has quietly supercharged ICE and Border Patrol with billions more in funding, greenlighting a 2026 enforcement push built on more workplace raids, more bodies in detention, and a public goal of hitting 1 million deportations a year, even though they’re not actually reaching that number yet. The big targeting pattern is still the same: sanctuary cities and blue urban areas with strong immigrant communities are the main punching bags, with Trump’s border czar Tom Homan openly pledging to “flood worksite enforcement operations” and stack agents in places like Los Angeles, New York, Portland, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, and other cities that refuse to roll over and become ICE’s junior police force. A lot of this is happening at workplaces and everyday spots—factories, warehouses, Home Depot parking lots, construction sites—because if courts and local governments block random street sweeps, Homan’s answer is: fine, we’ll just hit them on the job and scare the hell out of entire industries.
At the same time, they’re expanding who they can cage. In February, Trump’s people pushed out a directive that lets the government detain even refugees who were legally admitted but haven’t reached permanent residency yet, under the excuse of “re-vetting” tens of thousands of people who were already screened and living their lives here. Layer that on top of the earlier executive orders tightening entry, expanding “high-risk” country lists, and ordering constant re-review of anyone here on a visa or refugee status, and you get exactly what they wanted: a bigger pool of people they can grab, lock up, and shove into this detention and deportation pipeline. Counties and cities that try to protect residents with sanctuary policies are getting threatened with lost federal funding and lawsuits, so local governments are being financially blackmailed into cooperating with raids they know are ripping families apart.
And the human cost is brutal. ICE and DHS can put out all the sterile statements they want, but the numbers tell the story: at least 11 people have already died in ICE custody this year, just from January to early March. Newsweek dug into the death notices and found three people dying in just four days—an older Mexican man in California who’d been complaining of chest pain before collapsing, an Iranian man in Mississippi whose death wasn’t even properly disclosed within ICE’s own 48‑hour reporting rules, and a Haitian asylum seeker whose untreated tooth infection spiraled into a fatal medical crisis. Separate tallies show 32 deaths in ICE detention in 2025 alone, plus at least eight people shot and killed by ICE or CBP agents during Trump’s second term so far, including a German national killed near the Canadian border in Vermont in January. Advocacy groups have already documented six deaths in ICE custody in January alone across Texas, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and California, calling it a “horrific” start to 2026, and the curve is still heading in the wrong direction.
So while TV is fixated on bombs falling on Iran, ICE is still doing what ICE does: squeezing sanctuary cities, raiding worksites, quietly expanding who they can drag into cages, and stacking up deaths in detention centers that Americans never see. The war just gives them cover, because the more chaos Trump stirs abroad, the easier it is to crank the domestic machinery of fear, raids, and punishment without anybody asking why people are dying in government custody over a visa, an asylum claim, or a traffic stop.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Erika Kirk – USAFA Board of Visitors
Trump putting Erika Kirk on the Air Force Academy Board of Visitors is exactly what it looks like: a loyalty appointment, a culture-war move, and a little hometown political fan service for the MAGA base, not some carefully chosen defense expert who understands what future officers actually need. She’s there because she’s Charlie Kirk’s widow, because she now runs Turning Point USA, and because this White House is obsessed with planting their “anti‑woke” influencers anywhere they can reach young people, including at a service academy that’s supposed to be focused on warfighting, ethics, and competence, not Turning Point branding.
The mechanics are simple and gross: Charlie Kirk was appointed to the USAFA Board of Visitors in March 2025, he gets assassinated in September, and almost a year later Trump quietly swaps his widow into that same seat over a weekend with no big announcement, just her name suddenly showing up on the board’s website. The BoV is supposed to be an independent oversight body that looks at morale, curriculum, discipline, academic methods, finances—all the stuff that shapes what kind of officers walk out of that place—and instead of adding someone with serious military, academic, or ethical chops, they drop in a right‑wing influencer whose résumé is reality TV, Christian merch, and inheriting a campus propaganda machine.
And the conflict of interest is baked in. This board is now likely to be asked whether Charlie Kirk should get some kind of honorary degree or recognition from USAFA, after the graduates’ association already kicked that hot potato upstairs to them—and guess who now has a vote on whether her dead husband gets a shiny military credential he never came close to earning? Erika Kirk. MAGA politicians like Rep. August Pfluger are out here saying she’s the “right person” to carry on Charlie’s “legacy” at the Academy, which tells you everything: this isn’t about cadets, or readiness, or integrity; it’s about turning a federal oversight body into a stage for a campus‑culture martyrdom narrative and keeping the Turning Point brand stitched into the uniform without ever having to actually serve.
So yeah, your instinct is dead on: she doesn’t need to be anywhere near decisions about military cadets, but Trump’s whole playbook is stuffing every institution he can—from courts to academies—with ideologues, evangelicals, and grifters who owe him personally, and USAFA’s Board of Visitors is just the latest prop in that show.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anthropic vs. The Pentagon
Anthropic is basically the first big AI lab to look at the Pentagon and the Trump crew and say “no, we’re not going to power your mass surveillance and killer robots,” and the Pentagon responded by slapping them with a national‑security scarlet letter and trying to blacklist them across the whole government, so now Anthropic is suing and calling it what it is: political retaliation dressed up as “supply chain risk.”
Here’s the core of it: Anthropic had a big, roughly $200 million Pentagon contract on the table, and they drew two hard red lines—no use of Claude for autonomous lethal weapons, and no use for large‑scale domestic surveillance of Americans. Hegseth’s Pentagon wanted Claude for “any lawful purpose,” full stop, which is basically code for “we’ll say we’re not doing mass surveillance and killer robots, but we’re not letting you limit us if we decide to.” Negotiations blew up, Trump then ordered federal agencies to get off Anthropic within six months, and DoD formally tagged them as a “supply chain risk to national security,” a designation usually reserved for Chinese‑linked vendors and hostile‑state tech, not a U.S. company whose crime is saying “we don’t want to help you secretly track Americans and automate killing decisions.”
Anthropic fired back this week with two lawsuits—one in federal court in California and one in D.C. appeals—arguing that the government is using national‑security tools to punish them for their speech and their ethical stance on how their tech should be used, which is straight First Amendment territory plus due‑process issues because the blacklisting threatens to blow a multi‑billion‑dollar hole in their future revenue. They’re saying: this “supply chain risk” label doesn’t even fit the law for an American firm, there was no fair process, and contracts are already being canceled, with private partners freaking out because once the Pentagon paints you as a national‑security threat, that stench sticks.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon and Trump world are playing the usual script. Officials are insisting they can’t let a private company “dictate national defense strategy” and that tying their hands on AI could “cost American lives,” while a White House spokesperson is smearing Anthropic as “radical, woke” for not wanting their model wired directly into surveillance dragnets and automated weapons. Of course, at the same time, OpenAI swoops in and signs a fresh partnership with the Pentagon, explicitly agreeing to let DoD use its systems for any “lawful purpose,” claiming they’ve built in “safeguards,” which makes this whole thing look even more like Trump punishing the one lab that tried to hold a line while rewarding the one that said, “sure, just stamp ‘lawful’ on it and we’re good.”
So where we are now: Anthropic is trying to get a court to yank that “supply chain risk” label, stop the ban from spreading across the entire federal government, and set a precedent that the U.S. military can’t just crush an AI company for saying “we’re not going to be your domestic spy grid and Skynet testbed.” The Trump side is digging in, because for them this isn’t just about one contract; it’s about making an example out of anyone in tech who thinks they get to put ethics or public commitments ahead of whatever the Pentagon decides “lawful” means this week.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ticketmaster…DOJ screwing us again
Trump’s DOJ just took one of the clearest chances we’ve had in years to actually break up the Live Nation–Ticketmaster monster, and instead of swinging, they cut a cozy deal that keeps the monopoly mostly intact and lets the company celebrate while fans keep getting screwed.
The basic story: Biden’s DOJ, with 30‑plus states, sued Live Nation in 2024 to actually take a hammer to the whole structure—arguing they’ve been using their vertical grip on venues, promotion, artist management, and Ticketmaster to suffocate competition, punish independent promoters, and jack up fees while pretending it’s all “service charges” and “dynamic pricing.” That case finally goes to trial this month, the government is in court literally telling a jury the concert industry is “broken” and laying out how Live Nation locks venues into long‑term exclusive Ticketmaster deals and forces artists who want their giant amphitheaters to also hire Live Nation as promoter. Then, one week into trial, Trump’s DOJ under Pam Bondi blindsides everyone—especially more than two dozen state AGs—by cutting a surprise settlement that stops pushing for a breakup and lets Live Nation keep Ticketmaster.
What’s in the deal? On paper, it sounds like “accountability,” but if you translate it into plain English it’s mostly cosmetic: Live Nation pays a bit over $200 million (a fine the LA Times points out is basically a few days’ revenue for them), agrees to slowly phase out some of its exclusive ticketing contracts with venues, spins off a handful of amphitheaters, and promises to “open up” the Ticketmaster platform so other ticketing companies can theoretically sell through it. That means venues can, in theory, use more than one primary ticketing company and some competitors might be able to plug into Ticketmaster’s rails—but Live Nation still owns the rails, the data, and the leverage, and there’s zero clean structural separation between the promoter that controls the tours and the ticketing system fans are forced to use.
So, is it legit or will it hurt consumers? The way this went down, this is absolutely more of a win for Live Nation than for fans. Antitrust people and state AGs are basically saying: we had a shot at a real breakup, and Trump’s DOJ just tossed it for a settlement that leaves Live Nation–Ticketmaster intact, pumps their stock, and slaps them with some “conditions” they can likely route around with lawyers and creative contracts. The LA Times is already telling Swifties not to get excited because this “won’t help fans much,” and experts are pointing out the core source of power—owning Ticketmaster, owning/controlling hundreds of venues, and controlling promotion for hundreds of top artists—stays the same, which means the basic chokehold doesn’t change. More than two dozen states are refusing to sign onto the settlement and vowing to keep fighting in court precisely because they see this as Washington bailing out a monopoly that has been caught violating prior consent decrees and retaliating against anyone who tried to do business outside its ecosystem.
In normal‑people terms: the Trump administration is spinning this like they “took on Ticketmaster,” but what they really did was yank the steering wheel away from a case that might’ve actually split Live Nation and Ticketmaster, then hand Live Nation a deal that removes the existential threat while giving them some annoying but survivable new rules. Fans will still be stuck with one giant gatekeeper for big tours, still dealing with insane fees and crashes and bots and “platinum” pricing, just with a few more legal fig leaves taped over it so everyone in D.C. can pretend they did something.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Promises Made…and Broken
Trump has been out here running the same infomercial over and over—tariff rebates, giant tax refunds, cheaper gas, cheaper groceries, Doge‑style “rebates” and magical price drops—none of it grounded in math, law, or reality, but it sounds great if you’re desperate and not looking under the hood. He floated this fantasy of $2,000 “tariff dividend” checks to every American, funded by his global tariff hikes, promising on the record that the tariff money was “so substantial” he could cut people a “nice dividend” by the end of 2026 and deliver “the largest tax refund season ever.” Then the Supreme Court came in and blew up his whole legal theory for those tariffs, ruling 6–3 that he can’t just stretch emergency powers to slap endless tariffs on everything, and suddenly the revenue he was supposedly using to fund these rebate checks is both legally shaky and way too small—tariffs might pull in around $300 billion a year, while his own promises implied something like $600 billion in annual checks alone. Translation: there was never a real path for these $2,000 tariff checks without Congress writing a giant new program and tax code overhaul, and that’s not happening, especially now that the court has nuked his shortcut.
On prices, he did his usual “I’ll fix everything on day one” routine—he said he’d “end inflation,” cut energy and electricity prices in half in 12–18 months, get gas “below $2 a gallon,” slash the cost of new homes by half, cap credit card interest at 10%, and make groceries and housing “cheap again.” A year into this, independent fact‑checks have been blunt: gas might have ticked down a few cents here and there but nowhere near $2 on average, groceries are still elevated, housing is still brutal, and the supposed credit‑card cap never happened because it would require actual legislation, not a rally line. Same thing with his “biggest tax refunds ever” talk—he keeps hyping some future windfall for “working Americans” based on tariffs “replacing” income tax and eliminating taxes on tips, but right now it’s smoke: the IRS isn’t sending special Trump checks, the code hasn’t been rewritten to zero out the income tax, and the IEEPA ruling just made it even harder to pretend tariffs can fund his list of giveaways.
The crypto/DOGE‑rebate rhetoric is just another flavor of the same scam: he toys with the idea of some kind of “digital dividend,” hints at rewarding holders or customers tied to certain platforms, and lets his online echo chamber run wild connecting that to Dogecoin and “patriot coins,” but there’s no enacted program, no line in the budget, nothing in law. (It’s vapor, designed to keep the meme‑coin crowd emotionally invested while he does nothing concrete.) Meanwhile, the things he actually has delivered are the opposite of his affordability shtick: massive tariffs that raise prices on imported goods, a war with Iran that is already threatening energy markets, and regulatory chaos that keeps investors and companies jittery, which all filters back into higher costs for normal people. You can’t “end inflation on day one” while actively lighting new fires under supply chains and oil prices, but that’s his whole play—promise the moon, then blame everyone else when gravity shows up.
As for whether MAGA is waking up: some cracks are clearly there, but the core cult is still locked in. Polling around the Iran war shows that even among 2024 Trump voters, only about half actually supported attacking Iran, and non‑MAGA Republicans are noticeably more skeptical and worried about costs and safety. Broader polls show his overall approval underwater and a majority saying his Iran policy is making the U.S. less safe, which tells you a chunk of the electorate—including some former or soft Trump voters—are feeling the whiplash between the “no more stupid wars” promise and the reality of missiles flying. But the hardcore MAGA segment, the self‑identified “MAGA Republicans,” are still mostly ride‑or‑die: they’re the ones most likely to believe the tariff checks are still coming “once the deep state gets out of the way,” that gas “would already be $2 if not for Democrats,” and that every broken promise is someone else’s sabotage, not the fact that his numbers and legal theories never added up.
So when you stack it all up, the pattern is obvious: big, splashy promises—tariff rebate checks, huge tax refunds, cheaper gas and groceries, lower credit‑card rates, even crypto‑flavored “dividends”—almost none of it structurally possible without Congress and basic math, and now even less plausible after the courts kneecapped his tariff games, while his base gets just enough narrative to keep believing the payday is always just around the corner. Would you rather I pull together a clean, sharable list of these promises with a simple “fulfilled / busted / fantasy” tag next to each, or dig deeper into how the tariff ruling specifically killed the rebate‑check con?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GOP Infighting
The vibe around Trump right now is that the whole operation is running on raw adrenaline, fear of being blamed, and a ton of internal eye‑rolling, and Lindsey Graham has decided his role in this circus is to be the loud, unhinged hype man for permanent war while everyone else tries not to get dragged down with him.
Graham is full neocon peacock at this point—calling Iran’s situation a “Berlin Wall moment,” openly cheering regime change, bragging that Operation Midnight Hammer has created the “largest opportunity for peace in 1,000 years,” and going on Fox to say U.S. strikes on Iran are a “good investment” while tossing around lines about Iran’s regime inevitably collapsing. He’s treating this war like his personal redemption arc for Iraq, pushing Trump to go harder, talking about hitting Hezbollah and even hinting at Cuba being “next” in local TV hits, and it’s absolutely a spectacle—he looks more excited about the idea of the Iranian regime falling than remotely concerned about what a decade‑long regional mess and body count looks like in real life.
Inside the actual administration, though, the energy is way more tense and hedged than Graham’s TV rants make it look. Vance went from being the guy warning about “another dumb Middle East war” to quietly folding once Trump clearly wanted strikes, and now he’s trying to thread the needle: he publicly backs the war, talks about hitting Iran “swiftly and decisively,” but is clearly gambling his entire 2028 future on this being fast, low‑casualty, and somehow magically clean. Rubio, instead of going full Graham, is playing it way more lawyerly—backing Trump, calling the strikes necessary, but choosing his language carefully because he’s stuck managing the diplomatic blowback and evac chaos at State and knows if this turns into a forever war, he owns some of that mess. You can feel that both of them are trying to look like “serious statesmen” for the post‑Trump future while still staying inside the tent; they’re not cracking publicly, but they’re clearly not as amped as Graham is to ride this thing all the way to regime‑change fantasy land.
Then you’ve got people like Thom Tillis, who’s become one of the few Republicans actually saying the quiet part out loud: he’s gone on CNN to say we need transparency, a real authorization for use of military force, and an honest conversation with the public about what we’re doing, how long this lasts, and what “boots on the ground” really means. He’s also hammering other parts of the Trump apparatus—like Kristi Noem on immigration operations—for wrongful arrests and “failure of leadership,” and threatening to slow‑walk nominees, which is basically a giant red flare that not everyone in the GOP is willing to just salute and shut up anymore. That’s why people are grateful for him: he’s not some anti‑Trump liberal, he’s a Republican saying, “you don’t get a blank check for war and secretive security‑state bullshit,” and that really punctures the united‑front illusion Trump is trying to project.
Layer on top of that the Epstein cloud—the fact that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick now has to sit with House investigators about his Epstein ties and trips while Karoline is out there screeching on X about how Trump’s Iran strikes are “correcting decades of cowardice”—and you can see how maxed‑out this White House is. They’re juggling a war with no clear endgame, an economic mess, ICE abuses, Live Nation‑style corporate favoritism, and now fresh Epstein‑adjacent scrutiny on a sitting cabinet member. Are they cracking? Not in the sense of public resignations or open revolt yet, but the seams are absolutely showing: Graham is getting louder and weirder, Rubio and Vance are speaking in careful lawyer‑Marine hedges, Tillis is openly demanding receipts, and Trump’s press shop is trapped in permanent damage‑control mode, trying to sell all of it as 4D chess while the coalition underneath him gets more and more strained.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
House Oversight…what’s next
House investigators basically have a two‑track hit list right now: the Epstein orbit and the broader “powerful men and institutions who made this possible” orbit, and the schedule is going to drip out over the next few months instead of giving us one big, satisfying reckoning day.
On the Epstein side, the one locked‑in name and timing is Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who has already agreed to sit for a transcribed interview with the House Oversight Committee about his Epstein ties after new DOJ files showed he went to the island for a lunch years after he claimed he cut Epstein off. Comer is framing it as “proactive transparency,” but members like Nancy Mace have already talked about subpoenas, so expect that interview in the coming weeks—think March/early spring window—with a very performative “we’re holding even Trump’s cabinet accountable” gloss.
Alongside Lutnick, Oversight has already fired off letters asking a whole set of Epstein‑linked players to come in for transcribed interviews “in the coming months,” and that list is where it really gets wild: Bill Gates; Doug Band (Clinton’s longtime fixer); Apollo co‑founder Leon Black; Goldman Sachs chief legal officer Kathryn Ruemmler; billionaire Ted Waitt; longtime Epstein associate Lesley Groff; and assistant Sarah Kellen. Those don’t have exact calendar dates yet—but the committee is clearly planning to stagger them through spring and into early summer, which lets them stretch the scandal out and keep yanking headline after headline as each name sits in the hot seat. On top of that, Comer has already scheduled or conducted depositions with other Epstein‑world players: Les Wexner (Epstein’s financial patron), Ghislaine Maxwell (who took the Fifth and stonewalled), Epstein’s accountant, and his attorney, all slotted across February and March in a sequence—Wexner mid‑February, the Clintons at the end of February in some form, then the money and legal guys in March.
Zooming out, DOJ has also dumped a list of “politically exposed persons” tied up somewhere in the 3 million‑plus Epstein files—everyone from Trump and Clinton to Les Wexner, Steve Bannon, and a long roster of CEOs, execs, and random famous names—which gives House members a menu of targets to drag in if they decide the political heat is worth it. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie already went to DOJ, read unredacted files, and then Khanna straight‑up read six previously hidden names onto the House floor, so you can bet at least some of those guys are going to get “please come explain yourself” letters or subpoenas as this drags on. Bottom line: you’re going to see a steady parade of billionaires, fixers, lawyers, and at least one Trump cabinet secretary sitting for closed‑door transcripts and, eventually, some public hearings; the dates will roll out one by one, but the strategy is clearly to keep this “Epstein Files” story alive all year, not burn it all off in one week.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don’t know what’s going to happen today, but I’m a little on edge about it. Hang in there everyone.
Speak Truth! Keep speaking TRUTH!
Don’t Give up the Ship!
Go Cause Good Trouble, with Your Elbows Up!
These are facts that I researched and verified – AI helped put together some sentence structure, but the words and tone are mine. These are my views based upon facts, research and thoughtful consideration using logic. I own the copyright to any images used. I’m comfortable to stand alone to uphold truth. Feel free to check me, but do not attack me. I am only causing good trouble.